Rhetorical Question

If Nancy is a fraud and if she knows she's a fraud then what is she trying 
to do? What is her goal? Is it to make money? Is it to get a cult following 
of people like me, that tend to believe the information contained in 
Zetatalk? 

If her goal is financial, I would say she's a pretty lousy business 
entrepreneur and doubt she's made any money, not real money. Although I do 
think she has tried to make money by selling her book on amazon and through 
her website. 

I really seriously doubt her goal is fame and getting a cult going. There 
is no pledge of allegiance I am required to take or oath to Zetatalk. She 
just puts the information out there and I have to do the rest, read it and 
assimilate it into my silly head. Is that what a cult is? You people should 
really stop making yourself look uninformed and stupid by calling it a 
cult. Because that is clearly what it isn't. She doesn't care if I believe 
it or not, to be honest, in my opinion, not to the extent that it affects 
her life.

It's not a cult, ok? A cult takes you off to an island and makes you do 
things. Zetatalk doesn't ask anything of me, it doesnt ask me to do 
anything. It doesn't ask me to do anything for Nancy or anything for 
anyone. That can be proved. 

Let's be rational. There has to be a reason why she is putting out this 
information on the website. Let's try and figure out what it could be, the 
most reasonable explanation. Here is mine.

I think she really believes what she is putting up on the website. I think 
that is why she does it. I think she believes that the information comes 
from the Zetas. I think she is doing it because they want her to and she is 
performing a service to all of us. In my opinion, Zetatalk is among the 
greatest, perhaps THE greatest gift ever given to us as a species on this 
planet. But that's because I believe Zetatalk.

Anyway, by looking at the reasons for her doing what she is doing, we can 
learn alot, I believe. If someone knows other reasons why she is doing this 
that make good sense and not just "she's a loon", "she's old and senile", 
shoot from the hip babe. I'm all ears. I would love to learn more.

Oh, I am not sure if any of you ever bothered listening to her radio show 
broadcasts on Jeff Rense's show and others but she's pretty compelling in 
person too. She can do Zetatalk live, just like it's coming off the 
website. She'll "turn it over to the zetas" and you can tell that the 
information is not coming from her anymore but just being relayed through 
her. Kind of eerie but it has the same internal consistency as the website, 
when she turns it over on the radio shows.

If a fraud can be discovered, that's great. But we have to find what the 
purpose of the fraud is too. I don't think it's financial, I don't think 
it's cult status, so what is it? You all have so many opinions, maybe you 
can hit on the real purpose of her fraud, if it is a fraud.

But in my experience, someone does not produce that type of work and make 
that kind of effort without a purpose. The only real thing I think anyone 
could say is that Nancy is deluded and being fed misinformation from some 
source. But because of the nature of the information, even that seems 
remote. The information seems to come from a service to other source, if 
you'll allow me to use a term off the website. So it seems the purpose has 
to do with the remote source and not Nancy, would that be reasonable? 
Rhetorical question.

ABC