Planet X: The TARGETED Message

    What is the glue between these various sources targeting
    ZetaTalk, all claiming that ZetaTalk is wrong, or
    claiming it is right but having some lack of integrity
    factor that one can see is to rub off on Nancy and
    ZetaTalk. Glue is often hard to discern, and most often
    is not what one would assume.

    - In the case of Hazlewood on Art Bell, it is NOT Art at
      all that is being manipulated, but friends in the music
      field who then lean on Art. Don't those in the media
      have friends, family, and those they socialize with?
      Mark Hazlewood is the son of a famous musician,
      Lee Hazlewood, known personally to Art Bell, and
      thus, this string is pulled easily.

    - Sitchin as we have stated from the beginning of
      ZetaTalk has personal reluctance to realize the horror
      will occur in his lifetime, the not-in-my-lifetime
      response. Thus, ANY fact in the confusing mix will
      be used to assure him that it will NOT come in his
      lifetime. He additionally does not want to be the bearer
      of bad tidings, and even when convinced he has been
      wrong, will not say so, leaving this to others. Thus,
      pressing him to STATE 2003 or NOT has not been
      hard, as when pressed he would, of course, say NOT.
      His preference was, obviously, no comment, but he
      was not allowed this option by those who knew which
      way he would jump. Carrying great weight, his words
      are hoped to weight in among the crowd of lesser folk,
      discrediting ZetaTalk or at least discouraging the
      public from taking it seriously.

    - Jason Martell has long lectured about Planet X to
      MUFON, and has been long respected for his web
      site on Nibiru. Since he claims that Sitchin is the
      authority, would he be expected to say otherwise?
      Sitchin is pressed, Martell follows along, and all this
      is predictable.

    - McCanny, long in the science field, is more
      manipulated by his desire to be center stage, THE
      important one, than any deception. He is sitting on
      the fence, hoping to be RIGHT, to be able to claim
      so, no matter which way the outcome. Thus, when
      the weight of evidence leaned against 2003, he stated
      this, but when earth changes started weighing in, he
      dithered, and one can expect him to dither back but
      eventually to support ZetaTalk and claim he said so
      all along when the time comes. Thankfully, he is on
      film on the Planet X Video, stating 2003 will NOT
      occur, so he himself can be discredited, by his own
      words.

    - NASA has long been so tight in their Planet X
      cover-up that they can hardly reverse, but are
      doing so in the kiddy corner. Talking to kids, who
      talk to their parents, is allowed. They will claim it
      is the Sun, a comet, a nova, until the Spring of 2003
      when another excuse will be generated. To shelter
      the elite in bunkers, they may claim an aggressive
      asteroid, outgassing and moving directly toward
      Earth, or a close passage. This would allow all
      manner of movement of military and the power
      mongers in Washington DC, as well as those in
      Russia to move to the Urals, the Brits to Australia,
      and the wealthy to their spots, without delay.
      NASA is only addressing the issue in the kiddy
      corner, to have a PLACE to direct those asking,
      just as the elite are expected to direct the desperate
      to Troubled Times and ZetaTalk when asked what
      they, their governments, are going to DO to
      protect and help them during these times.

    - The Norlock claim is obvious. It appears, on its
      face, to substantiate ZetaTalk, and should Nancy
      CLAIM it, she would have egg on her face.
      Expected to be too bloody from the beating to notice,
      she was expected to embrace it, which she did not.
      Thus, this so-called-friend came cloaked poorly,
      and did not succeed.

    - The media can be expected to report stories as
      provided, as they do today. Does anyone think that
      the mix being presented by the major media,
      anywhere in the world, is a fair reporting of what
      is RELEVANT? Where the press is not suppressed,
      it is burdened with reporting the irrelevant, and this
      is not specific to any country, but is a factor of
      existing politics and control.

        ZetaTalk™: Targeted Message
            (http://www.zetatalk.com/transfor/t147.htm)