Re: Planet X: Changing the PAST?

And last Saturday, Mar 2, during the Live ZetaTalk IRC Session, the
Zetas explained why NASA et al went forward with such a disastrous plan!

(NancyL) PLANET X ON SCI.ASTRO
(NancyL) 1. Can the Zeta's comment on the recent general mood of the
sci.astro boards. 
(NancyL) 2. Can the Zeta's comment on the apparent changes to NEAT and
DSSII images recently documented?
(NancyL) ZT: Following the posting of an infrared image taken on Jan 5,
2002, the establishment was uneasy but felt the presence of an existing
star in the near vicinity would suffice to explain, in the main, to the
man on the street, the image.
(NancyL) ZT: Those following the debate closely, which several thousand
are, were not so confused, however, but indeed recognized, in spite of
the image makers later protests, that TWO objects were present in the
new image, not on the star charts.
(NancyL) ZT: In that once is an aberation, in science, but twice is a
pattern, the lights went off when the French team came through again
with an image taken on Jan 19, 2002.
(NancyL) ZT: This had the astonishing association of being 1. a
legitimate image, taken by a student given access to the equipment as a
part of a training routine, and 2. having the stamp of the observatory,
and 3. accompanied by an ESO star chart to be used as comparison.
(NancyL) ZT: They were horrified.  All attempts to suppress such an
occurence had slipped through their fingers, as they had not gone DOWN
to the level of trainers and students in their covert warnings to
astronomers.
(NancyL) ZT: The cat was well out of the bag by the time the
establishment became aware.
(NancyL) ZT: Thus, they huddled, no comment being the mode, as noted by
Steve Havas who found it odd that David Tholen of the Haiwai complex was
absent for days after this announcement.
(NancyL) ZT: The options were discussed.  Should they call it a
NEWobject, perhaps a nova, and deal with the motion according to our
coordinates later?
(NancyL) ZT: Should they ignore it, and have their lack of interest
rouse curiosity?
(NancyL) ZT: Should they state that this is an existing object, the
excuse used on Jan 5, 2002, always the most comfortable answer.
(NancyL) ZT: They chose the latter, and proceeded to INSERT an object in
the star charts that would be downloaded by interested parties in the
public, so that the public, comparing, would find the NEW object
identified in France an OLD object, and dismiss the image.
(NancyL) ZT: They proceeded, but Steve Havas is a gifted contactee whom
we have great confidence in, and thus he was guided as to WHERE to look,
and WHEN.
(NancyL) ZT: His early post that he was suspicious when Tholen did not
post a comment to Nancy's announcement shows he was aware that
activities behind the scenes were in process.
(NancyL) ZT: Caught in the Act! is his statement to sci.astro, and this
it was.
(NancyL) ZT: By pointing to what was a botched doctoring job, in time
for many thoughout the world to follow in his footsteps and do their own
checking, he produced a catch-22 for the establishment.
(NancyL) ZT: Should they proceed to fix their botches, hurriedly done by
inexperienced image fixing disinfo artists, they had to worry about
astronomers worldwide comparing the NEW star charts to those they had in
their possession already.
(NancyL) ZT: Thus, the decision was made to withdraw the botched and
doctored images, leaving Steve looking like a liar.
(NancyL) ZT: This supposition was posted today, Mar 2, 2002, on
sci.astro, by Nancy, so that those astronomers around the world, who
number in the hundreds, who have done their own comparisons and been
horrified, will be alerted to the plan.
(NancyL) ZT: Thus, though Steve may come under some heat, he should and
we are confident will, understand that many are out there have PROOF now
of the coverup, and the search for Planet X has now intensified a
thousand fold.
(NancyL) ZT: For each astronomer looking, or thinking, there will for
every astronomer finding the images being doctored, the bastion of
integrity the star charts are supposed to be being DOCTORED, there will
be dozens, each, that will be talked to privately in hushed tones about
this matter.
(NancyL) ZT: A wildfire has been lit, and cannot be damped.  And Steve
cannot be touched else suspicions will go wild.