Re: Planet X: Moon SWIRL

In Article  <f0b30c00.0201071714.21db051d@posting.google.com> Jeff Root wrote:
> Artificial satellites always spin to some exent.  If they 
> are made to constantly face one side toward the Earth, 
> as the Moon does, then they will spin one rotation per 
> orbit, just as the Moon does.  

The Moon does a slow spin as it seems glued to the surface of Earth in
some manner.  Which is of course what causes spin in any case, an
attraction or repulsion between objects free to move.  But there is a
different between a DELIBERATE spin given to a probe or satellite, which
would otherwise not spin, such that momentum keeps this man-made spin
going, and an out-of-control spin caused by other factors which man does
not understand, which is what the Zetas were referring to below: 

>> This is not explored by man, who strives to move 
>> directly in space and treats any spin in an object 
>> under their control as a problem to be corrected 
>> promptly, as in "the probe has developed a spin and 
>> is threatening to spin out of control".  The reasons for
>> the spin having developed in the first place is treated 
>> as an irrelevancy, and the only issue whether or not 
>> the probe is under control.
>
> Actually, the only time a spacecraft "spins out of control"
> is when something specific causes it to do so, and the 
> specific cause is of great concern.  In 1966, astronauts 
> Dave Scott and Neil Armstrong were in orbit in a tiny 
> Gemini capsule ... The astronauts had guessed 
> wrong: the problem was that one of the thrusters on
> the Gemini capsule had stuck open.  

I doubt this is the only time something threatened to spin
out-of-control, as frankly the trajectory of probes is periodically in
need of adjustment by their little jets, and I suspect satellites too,
so some sort of OTHER spin or attraction/repulsion factors are at play
that man does not understand.  

>> The spin is suppressed by the little jets that allow
>> man to control his probes when their trajectory needs
>> to be corrected, and this thus allows mankind to feel
>> smug about his knowledge of how things work.  The moons
>> of Planet X, which trail it like a string of pearls out
>> in space, have no such little jets, so nature, not man,
>> rules, and the full RESULT of a spin out in space can be
>> observed.  Why do the moons trail, and spin in a slow
>> whirlwind behind Planet X, rather than orbit the planet?
>
> This begins using the word "spin" to mean "rotation of 
> a body", and ends using the word "spin" to mean "bodies
> moving along circular or looping paths".  The writer was
> apparently unaware that the definition changed in 
> mid-paragraph.
 
    The spin is in the TAIL as a WHOLE, not each 
    individual moon or hunk of trash in the tail.  Treat the 
    tail as a skater on the ice, arms out or hugged close, in a 
    spin.  We will ask our emissary, Nancy, to repost our  
    explanation of tornadoes, big or small, and the cause 
    of this, in explanation for the behavior of the tail.
        ZetaTalk™

As requested, from existing ZetaTalk, in the next post.