Re: Honest Question...Poleshift and the Pyramids...Pole/Axis Shift in Cayce Quotes
David Paterson wrote:
> So, overall we have 1 (one) planet (Mercury) with
> its magnetic field oriented in the same direction as
> Earth, 2 (two) pointing the other way (Jupiter and
> Saturn) and 2 (two) not aligned in any way with the
> Earth. Plus some odds and ends.
The Zetas explain:
Children playing with magnets soon discover that
magnets brought in close proximity to each other
want to snap together, north pole to south pole, and
can be positioned north pole to north pole only
under force. Lined up side by side, as long as a
certain distance is maintained and friction against
a table top or other surface is present, they can
coexist with without polar symmetry, however.
Why the pressure to snap together and align when
poles approach, where not so in a side by side
arrangement? An analysis of magnetic particle
flow in magnets placed end to end show the
particles flow moving through the entire length
of the linkup of magnets, creating a longer and
larger field before the particles return to the shared
south pole at the end of the lineup. But what of
the particle flow when magnets are positioned side
by side? The key here is the strength of the fields,
and the closeness of the magnets.
- If the magnets are of a strength and closeness to
each other such that a returning particle finds
itself fighting the flow to do anything but go to
the far edge of the overall mega-magnetic field
created by the group, the magnets will line up
with their poles in the SAME DIRECTION.
- If any of the magnets are of a significant
strength, but the magnets are not so close that
returning particles are perforce forced to the
outside of the overall mega-magnetic field
created by the group, the returning particles will
take the path of LEAST RESISTANCE and
return via a magnet in opposition. In fact, this
magnet will be in opposition in the grouping
not because of its original orientation but
because the returning flow CREATES a south
pole handy to the flow, establishing the
magnetic orientation. This happens, not
surprisingly, in gaseous planets as they have
the greatest mobility in their composition and
the least resistance to change.
- If the magnet in a side by side arrangement
are at the greatest distance from the dominant
magnet in the group, they will align in
orientation with that magnet as the overall flow
of particles is such at the PERIMETER of the
mega-magnetic field such that the return
south is sweeping like eddy currents at the
very outside of all the magnets in the group.
There peripheral magnets thus align in the
SAME DIRECTION as the dominant magnet.
When this path of least resistance is established in a
gaseous planet, the magnetic particle flow takes a
short cut to the south pole of the Sun, the dominant
magnetic influence in the area. Those particles
flowing through such a gaseous magnet do NOT
return to the south pole of the planet they have just
passed through, but move along to the south pole
of the Sun. Magnetic fields are measured by man
not by the flow of particles, but by the DIRECTION
of the flow, as the orientation is determined by
which way a magnet swings under the influence of
this flow. Thus, probes sent to measure the
magnetic field of a gaseous planet find their test
magnets swinging into alignment, both the south
pole of the gaseous planet and the test magnet
lined up to act as a conduit for the intense flow of
magnetic particles on the move. The fact that
there is no actual FIELD about the gaseous planet,
no return from the north pole of the gaseous
magnet to its south pole, is not noted.
ZetaTalk