Re: Pole Shifts vs Ice Ages (Revisited)

"John Shakespeare" wrote (to Nancy):

<snip>
> Read a book, stop being a kook.

John,

And you should get your head up from the books, go out in your local area
(i.e. the Nordic region) and start looking at all the signs that it was once
a lush equatorial area.

If you go West to the Scandinavian peninsula, you should also be able to
find plenty of evidence of earlier tectonic plate crashes, plates subducting
etc. A few hours flight to Iceland, and you can get to one of the most
geothermal active areas on the border between tectonic plates moving away
from each other. It should be obvious that Earth changes happen abruptly.
Nothing weird about this at all.

What is weird is when geologists starts talking about California moving
North at a rate of a few inches per year, so that within n,000 years, it
will be up by Alaska. Such "scientists" seem to have forgotten that Earth
build-up is rapid and violent, and that the tear-down erosion is what takes
time.

What the Zetas have stated is that the Planet X passing in 2003 will cause
the most violent Pole Shift in 50,000 years, and that the crust of the Earth
will move approx. 90 degrees. If you can get by the first Zeta image on the
front page of the ZetaTalk site (as I know many people disregard the
information since it is supposed to be relayed from ETs), there is a wealth
of rather precise information on the consequences of the upcoming Planet X
passing. There is also a lot of information on safe and unsafe places.
Generally speaking, no structures are safe if you are close to any of the
fault lines or closer to the ocean than 200 miles and/or lower than 600
feet, but if you relocate to a safe, high elevation area, you should be
safe. Finland will be diving distance after the Pole Shift, according to the
Zetas, so I would recommend looking for an alternate, high ground location.

Ian


PS.
There's no need being an a**h*** just because you don't agree in the Zeta
explanation as forwarded by Nancy. The whole topic of Planet X and a
possible Pole Shift in 2003 is just too serious for name calling etc.