Re: Honest Question...Poleshift and the Pyramids...Pole/Axis Shift in Cayce Quotes

In Article <fc8f94e.0110182016.7fa254dc@posting.google.com> I Don’t wrote:
> In Article <3BCF29EC.A2DD155@zetatalk.com> Nancy Lieder wrote:
>> In Article  <3BCB6D4A.B88DE389@navix.net> David Knisely wrote:
>>> Hmmm... I think the question should be: Why, if the 
>>> Earth is "aligning with a master, the Sun"... does a 
>>> reversal of the Sun's magnetic field not cause the 
>>> Earth to flip over?
>> 
>>> The sun's field doesn't have a direct impact on our field 
>>> of the earth, ...
>> 
>> And this is why the two magnetic planets close to the 
>> Sun, the Earth and Mercury, both have the SAME 
>> POLARITY, the same direction, etc?  Because they are 
>> not listening to a master, are not in sync, etc? 
>
> I guess you're arguing with Knisely here, but what about
> my question concerning the Earth not flipping over in 
> response to the Sun's field reversal?

The Sun reversing is a THEORY, only, postulated to explain wandering
poles and apparent pole reversals on the Earth, as evidenced by the
magnetic alignment of the crust as frozen in hardened lava, etc.  Some
existing ZetaTalk on that ..

    The Earth's polarity, where the magnetic North Pole
    points consistently in one direction as though focused 
    on a distant point in the Universe, does not change, 
    ever. This is an illusion, a hypothesis that humans 
    have concocted to explain what they find in the 
    Earth's crust. In this hypothesis, they are assuming 
    that the Earth's crust does not move about, but it does.
    What humans are measuring is the confusion in the 
    crust, and not the direction of the magnetic North Pole.
    Between pole shifts, however, there are slight 
    movements of the magnetic North Pole, especially 
    during the time just before and after a pole shift - 
    approximately a hundred years on either side. The 
    giant comet [Planet X] speaks to the Earth from afar.
    Scientists who do not buy into the pole shift will 
    argue endlessly that it is the poles that move and 
    reverse ....
        ZetaTalk™, Pole Reversal

    The wandering poles attest to prior pole shifts but 
    don't give a true picture, as many times poles situate 
    over oceans or land that subsequently submerges, 
    areas unexplored by modern man. Humans 
    measure the significance of pole shifts by their 
    variance from today's poles, where in fact the 
    measure should be from the pole's placement prior
    to the shift. What is termed a wandering pole is 
    mankind's best efforts to trace the placement of the
    poles, dating the record in hardened magma which
    captures the moment's magnetic alignment. The 
    Ice Ages, occurring over northern Europe and 
    America, are also written records of when poles 
    were situated over those spots. Pole shifts can be as
    slight as a few degrees or close to 180 degrees,
    the most extreme case. ... 

    Dramatic reversals happen rarely, as [Planet X]
    must virtually come between the Earth and the 
    Sun to have this much influence. This happens in
    only 15% of the pole shifts, as where this 
    vulnerable position constitutes perhaps 30% of 
    the possible arc, the range of possibility is such 
    that the Earth may be on the opposite side of the 
    Sun just as often as not, cutting these odds in half.
    When the Sun stands between the Earth and
    [Planet X] there is, in essence, no pole shift but 
    simple tension and compression in the crust, 
    expressed as increased earthquakes and volcanism.
    This safety zone constitutes another 40% of the 
    possible arc. The remaining 45% of the arc 
    experiences alignment shifts, rather than 
    opposition shifts. Thus, the wandering Poles 
    reflect 15% massive opposition movement, where
    the North Pole is tipped backwards away from
    [Planet X], balanced by 45% minor alignment 
    movement, where the North Pole is tipped forward
    slightly to line up with the 12th Planet's magnetic
    alignment. 

    This finds the records of where the North and 
    South Poles have been, in the main, essentially 
    close to their position at present. Mankind is 
    missing at least half the record, those former 
    poles which are now under water, but the 
    pattern would not look much different with 
    these missing pieces added. Human written and
    verbal history will not serve man well in 
    preparation for the forthcoming pole shift, as a 
    shift as devastating as this one will be has not 
    occurred even within the past 50,000 years. Even
    The Flood was merely the result of two minor 
    shifts, back to back - one to displace the South 
    Pole so that partial melting and softening started,
    and the second to break and drop the suspended 
    ice into the ocean.
        ZetaTalk™, Wandering Poles
            (http://www.zetatalk.com/science/s72.htm)
             Note: diagram on page