link to Home Page

Re: ZetaTalk and Spaceguard UK (D8)


After the math wizards involved in this discussion finally DO put the

   Inverse Square law (F=M1*M2/r^2)  and
   Newton's laws (F = Ma)

and find that F = F NOT when applies to the Moon, I suggest to compute
the Repulsion Force per the Zetas description of when and how fast this
clicks in, and see if THIS computes not only for the Earth and Moon, but
explains why Planet do NOT perturb closer into the Sun, but stay in
their orbit paths when passing each other!  There is, after all, no
explanation for this in current human theory. Unless everyone runs away
when it is shown that human math cannot be put on the same page, and you
have NO explanation for why the Moon is UP there, and why planets do NOT
perturb TOWARD the Sun.

    Why would the planets not drift into the Sun? Are the orbits
    all that swift so that centrifugal force is extreme? ... The reason
    Mankind is Unaware of a repulsive force, also inherent in
    gravity, is that for this to become evident there must be a
    semblance of equality in size and weight, i.e. the mass of the
    objects, and freedom of movement such as exists in space,
    and lack of undue influence from other nearby objects. ... The
    repulsion force is generated as a result of two bodies exerting a
    gravitational force on each other. ... Where the repulsion force
    comes to equal the force of gravity by the time the objects in
    play would make contact, it builds at a rate that differs from
    gravity. ... The repulsion force is infinitesimally smaller than
    the force of gravity, but has a sharper curve so that it equals
    the force of gravity at the point of contact.

        ZetaTalk™, Repulsion Force
            (http://www.zetatalk.com/science/s34.htm)

    Gravity particles produce a flow but produce no discernible
    flow, and have no irregularities in the pattern. Does your
    Earth not pull evenly from all parts of its surface? And if
    there is a flow, then at what point does the flow reverse, such
    that surface particles are pushed away? In fact there is a
    reversal, but the outward streams are propelled, with a force
    and at a speed so much greater than the downward drafts that
    this occurs over less of a surface area and without engaging
    the mass of the object. A laser of gravity particles, versus a
    floodlight upon the return. So why would the weight of
    returning particles be the only ones mankind is aware of,
    and why would they not feel the violent lift of the updrafts?
    The updrafts blast through, tearing a hole as it were, where
    the returning particles do not tear what they press upon,
    and so have the greater effect.

    Gravity particles, in their motion, do not affect what they
    move against or through, the effect being in essence
    mechanical. The upward drafts push aside other matter,
    letting it return upon completion of the updraft, leaving no
    trace of the temporary tear. The downward push of gravity
    particles returning to the large mass they are attracted to,
    the core of the Earth for instance, spread out upon objects
    they encounter, taking some time to drift through these
    object and with a constant downward press during the
    motion of this drift. Thus, returning particles, due to the
    time they spend upon and within the surface objects, and
    due to their continual direction of motion, are a mechanical
    force that is stronger, overall, than the updraft of particles
    that quickly pass through the surface objects, essentially
    pushing them aside rather than engaging them.

    The nature of this gravity flow is what determines the
    repulsion force we speak of. It is a complement of gravity
    only when large bodies are close to each other. The
    updrafts, when encountering a large body also exuding
    updrafts of gravity particles, hold the bodies apart. This
    occurs at what humans would call a distance from each
    other, as small objects such as satellites do not exude
    updrafts and if far enough from the surface of a
    gravitational giant such as a planet, find a down-draft
    and updraft of gravity particles in balance, what humans
    might term in their ignorance a zero gravity field,
    weightlessness. At this point the updrafts are still tearing
    through, but at a slower rate, so that a mechanical push
    upward is involved, and the down-drafts are more thinly
    dispersed over the surface as they work their way through
    the density of these objects in space. Large bodies,
    exuding their own updrafts of gravity particles, create a
    situation where their updrafts and the updrafts from
    another sun or planet bump against each other, creating a
    buffer and preventing the gravity masses from touching or
    even approaching each other except at great distances.

        ZetaTalk™, Gravity Flow
            (http://www.zetatalk.com/science/s96.htm)

    Gravity is particles, moving, just as magnetic fields are, and
    there is a polarization in gravity, which we have explained
    as the repulsion force. Before mankind discovered that
    magnetism was polarized, they discovered it as an attractive
    force. Metallic items stuck to the sides of magnetized rock -
    how curious. After centuries of digging about in this
    phenomena, humans have satisfied their curiosity to the
    extent that they understand that magnetism is a force field,
    has a flow out from one pole and in at the other pole, that
    the Sun and some other planets are magnetized and line up
    with each other. They still don't understand the cause of
    this force field, or its nature. Magnetism is caused by a
    particle, in motion, as we have explained. What other
    explanation is there for a force that reaches out and affects
    another? Magic?

    The bi-polar aspect of magnetism is only apparent when
    what occurs in nature can be countered in the laboratory.
    You force magnetized objects to do what they do not want to
    do - touch north pole to north pole or vice versa. Then you
    can observe the bi-polar nature. In gravity, you are seeing
    but one aspect in the positioning of the planets, and dealing
    with a phenomena that does not lend itself to easy
    experimentation. However, experimentation is possible, in
    space and away from the surface of the planet. The repulsion
    force fills the gap in some of your other theories where you
    have no explanation for discrepancies.

    In magnetism, the simple flow of particles creates more than
    a force for alignment, it creates an attraction. The gap is filled.
    Like water in a stream, where flotsam eventually lines up in
    the center, evenly spaced, just so magnetized objects do not
    keep their distance when free to move. They approach each
    other, and attach like a string of pearls. Likewise the
    phenomena of gravity, where the desire to fill the gap causes
    objects to approach one another. It is only where this gap is
    overfilled, by the presence of two large objects coming near,
    that the repulsion force is expressed. There is no room for the
    flow of gravity particles, so the objects stay apart!

         ZetaTalk™, Gravity Particles
             (http://www.zetatalk.com/science/s87.htm)