| |
|
Mon, 10 Sep 2001 05:51:45 -0500
<3B9C9B40.DAE4C932@zetatalk.com>
Re: Planet X: NOT a Star
Fri, 7 Sep 2001 16:44:09 GMT
<9natgp$abj$1@news1.xs4all.nl>
Re: Planet X: NOT a Star
Fri, 7 Sep 2001 13:55:18 GMT
<9najk6$kbm$1@news1.xs4all.nl>
Re: Planet X: NOT a Star
Mon, 10 Sep 2001 05:50:50 -0500
<3B9C9B09.98DEE788@zetatalk.com>
Re: Planet X: Cannot be a Brown Dwarf
Wed, 05 Sep 2001 11:33:11 -0700
<3B966FE7.BC5BC1BB@company.com>
Re: Planet X: Alternative Explanation 2
Thu, 30 Aug 2001 15:11:18 -0700
<3B956589.9D832382@zetatalk.com>
Re: Planet X: Alternative Explanation 2
Mon, 10 Sep 2001 05:53:50 -0500
<3B9C9BBD.FDB31B6C@zetatalk.com>
Re: Planet X: Magnitude (Revisited)
Mon, 10 Sep 2001 05:49:57 -0500
<3B9C9AD4.C10BE90E@zetatalk.com>
Re: Asteroid Could be a Record
Mon, 10 Sep 2001 05:52:28 -0500
<3B9C9B6B.263986B@zetatalk.com>
Re: Nancy L: When .. see Planet-X with the Naked Eye?
Mon, 10 Sep 2001 05:53:06 -0500
<3B9C9B92.17967A6E@zetatalk.com>
Re: Life on Zeta Reticuli?
Sun, 9 Sep 2001 14:23:17 -0400
<TnOm7.93911$ZJ.1116517@e3500-atl2.usenetserver.com>
Re: Life on Zeta Reticuli?
Mon, 10 Sep 2001 06:04:47 -0500
<3B9C9E4F.D90F1DDC@zetatalk.com>
Re: Viewing Planet-X with a Telescope
