Re: Two Honest Questions to Nancy/Zetas

Tessa Fürle wrote:
> 
> 1) How can the establishment/conspirators make their plans for the year
>    2003 when the Zetas have said that humans are NOT able to COMPUTE the
>    correct date? The Zetas have repeatedly said that this is not a normal
>    comet, that the precise distance is not measurable, the uptick is not
>    known etc. So how can humans arrive at the correct date ON THEIR OWN,
>    without any help or information from aliens etc? How can humans
>    independently compute the date by themselves? How can NASA know at all?
>    Do they simply trust information that MJ12 got from aliens in the early
>    days? The Zetas shall explain, please.

Your questions answer themselves.  If you know or suspect that there is
a pole shift coming, it is not really relevant if it is at 3:00 or 3:18,
or on Monday or Wednesday, or even in May or June.  All you really need
to do is narrow it down to about a 3 month window.

Needless to say, in project development circles, this is what is known
as a "hard deadline" so any plans you will make will have to accommodate
the following facts:

1) The deadline, whenever it is exactly, is not going to move because
   you are behind schedule.  Planning on an early delivery of *whatever* is
   a preferred solution, because stuff comes up.

2) The population at large is likely to suspect that Something Is Up
   some time before the actual event.  The reaction of billions of people
   is not something ANYBODY can predict or control, so any plans need to be
   early, not "on time".  Trying to "escape" when there is general panic is
   not a good choice.

3) If you have gone to the trouble of setting up a survival camp away
   from the general populace, who you intend to abandon to their own
   devices, your "escape" to this camp is not something you will want to
   draw attention to.  A more likely scenario is a slow slinking away,
   which by the time the reason is figured out, its too late.

All of this points to the likeliness that the actual date is not
relevant to any plans on the part of the elite, only the general time
frame.

> 
> 2) What are the famous three days of darkness that many
>    seers/prophets/channelers foretell? Why exactly three days and not two
>    or four or five days? The prophets speak about three days of darkness on
>    the ENTIRE Earth, during which the cataclysms happen. But how can this
>    be when only one half of the Earth experiences a long night during the
>    passage of the 12th whereas on the other half the Sun shines? So why
>    exactly three days of darkness on the entire Earth? The Zetas shall
>    explain, please.
> 
> Grüße von Niels

Again, the question answers itself.  Prophets report on internal
knowledge, which is highly subject to inaccuracies and personal bias,
and to external information that they learn, also subject to a different
list of inaccuracies.  What is most likely being reported is the
historical information that the earth stopped, and depending on where
you were at the time, it was either dark or light (an oversimplification
to be sure).  Since they did not have commercial airline service, it
seemed that everywhere they went it was also dark/light, so a reasonable
assumption (at the time and setting) was that it was the "entire
earth".  As any international traveler knows, it seems easier to "go
west" then east. An extended day seems more natural than an extended
night, with the attendant fear of the dark that is always with us to
varying degrees.  (If you can't accept this that most of humanity is
still afraid of the dark, just consider almost any city, ablaze through
the night with light.)  In other words, a long night would have made a
much greater impression on someone than a long day for just the same
reason that a flight from London to LA might seem easier than from LA to
London.  The prophets are not accurately reporting what is GOING to
happen, they are reporting the echoes of the past.

I speak as myself, not for anybody else.

The Small Kahuna