Re: Nancy Lieder Exposed!

In article <9hd0u9$2e5$3@bob.news.rcn.net>, Chris1 wrote:
> In <9hcu00$srk$2@news1.xs4all.nl>, joshb@mraha.kitenet.net (josX) wrote:
>> In article <9hcstu$hho$3@bob.news.rcn.net>, Chris1 wrote:
>> <snip>
>>> There is just way too much "information" out there these days to consider 
>>> all of it open-mindedly. An intelligent and reasonable person will simply 
>>                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> discard some "information" as nonsense without giving it a moment's 
>>  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> thought. Nancy's "information" falls into this category.
>>  ^^^^^^^
>>
>> Thank you for diagnosing yourself!
>>
>> Talk about #$%@*&^ up!;-, at least both sides got their numbskulls now,
>> not?  Unbelievable...!
>
> Here's some information for you:
>
> "the gov't is watching my every move they're after me! the pidgeons in my 
> frige are conspiring to move the planet pluto into my bathroom it'll kill 
> me for sure ahhhh help!"
>
> Be sure to investigate every detail and nuance of this information before 
> you make any judgements on it's validity.

:)
an example, good.

Let us investigate, and lay the ZetaTalk along side of it!

> "the gov't is watching my every move they're after me!

You:
 The government(CIA) has been known to kill people, and were "after them".
 There were many reasons why the government has killed many ppl, and has
 tortured probably more if we discount the war-deaths. They did this to
 gather information, to eliminate trators etc.
 We have the cover-up going, proving there is something worth to
 cover-up.  There have highly likely been deaths to keep the secret,
 if not only because a dead-man can't speak his mind. Some of the
 accidents of NASA for example (filling a cabin with pure oxygen
 with cabling running everywhere? common!  (that was the case wasn't
 it? saw it on discovery-chanel), are open executions that are not
 even open for doubt, amounting to public statements.  The government
 kills, and before it kills someone it is "after them".  You could
 be one of those ppl.
 Government-kills+cover-up+...=> possible
 To have a better judgement, maybe you can elaborate on why they want you?,
 that should go on the dots.

ZetaTalk:
"zetatalk is a thelepathic message from aliens to Nancy"
 Thelepathy, although not at all comon, does exist in rudimentary form and
 sometimes manifests itself amoung humans (also, why else would there be
 a word for it for instance...). Aliens are widely recognized to exist
 somewhere in the Universe. We can fly to other planets, so it is asumed
 they can. Many aliens are thought to be more advanced than man. Strangely,
 most ppl think they are "just not around earth", why is still a dark
 mystery, maybe because they don't go to the Mall. This makes it possible
 thelepathic aliens are communicating with a human, since Nancy is a human,
 it could be her. Telepathy+aliens+moving-aliens=>possible.

> the pidgeons in my 
> frige are conspiring to move the planet pluto into my bathroom it'll kill 
> me for sure ahhhh help!"

Frozen pidgeons are not known to conspire against their owner. Not even
live pidgeons do except for droppings, I assume frozen-pidgeons are even
less likely to this kind of actions than unfrozen ones. 
Pidgeons also can't fly outside the atmosphere, which would be nessecary
to reach Pluto.

> Be sure to investigate every detail and nuance of this information before 
> you make any judgements on it's validity.

I have, how else can I make a good judgement on it's likelyhood.
Remember, until there has been a pole-shift, there is no Scientific
/certainty/. Until someone dies, technically it is also uncertain if he/she
will ever: certainty it happened only comes after the events. On the same
level: you don't know if the Mall is still existing when you go shoping,
technically, you only have likelyhood to go on.

So: you need to investigate, how can you otherwise claim anything, especially
about something as big and consistant as ZetaTalk.com ?

Why don't we get back to the issues, it's obvious you need to look and
possibly investigate something before you can say anything about it.
You are saying "you must be nuts to believe there is going to be a pole-shift
in may-2003, therefore it isn't so!". I almost see the toddler with the
big-underlip slapping his spoon in his food crying "mommy isn't going to
work!".

Look at the evidence, try the flash-frozen-Mammoth for instance... .

regards,
Jos