Re: Hints of Planet-sized Objects Bewilder Hubble Scientists
In Article: <9hdsg4$gmm$1@nntp1.jpl.nasa.gov> Ron Baalke
> JET PROPULSION LABORATORY
> CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
> NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
>
> Hints of Planet-sized Objects Bewilder Hubble Scientists
> June 27, 2001
> Scientists are mystified by what may be unexpected, wandering,
> planet-sized objects. ... The unusually short period (less than 20
> hours) over which these microlensing events occurred indicates
> that the mass of the intervening objects could be as little as
> 80 times that of Earth. If confirmed, these bodies would be the
> smallest celestial objects ever seen beyond our solar system that
> are not orbiting any star. ... Theoretically, these objects might
> be planets that were gravitationally torn away from parent stars
> in the cluster. However, they are estimated to make up as much
> as 10 percent of the cluster's mass -- too numerous to be
> wandering, "orphaned" planets.
And other recent announcements (below) that support the ZetaTalk
descriptions of Planet X made in 1995:
Fires such as go on in the center of suns do not only
proceed full bore. Why would they? Do you not have
a fire within you that is maintained at a steady
temperature? Do you not find that the fire in your
fireplace can be slowed by adjusting the damper?
Humans do not understand what is occurring within
the Sun, a combustion of sorts that ignited because of the
pressure of elements following the big bang, during the
congealing period. The Sun was not born, lit. It lit as
compression continued to the point where a product of
subatomic particle collision did not dissipate, but
accumulated, and the degradation of this substance is
what you are viewing and feeling in your sunlight.
This is a simplistic explanation for a complicated
process. [Planet X] has a similar process
ongoing within its core, but being composed of heavier
substances than your Sun, this process is slowed.
ZetaTalk, [Planet X] Glow
(http://www.zetatalk.com/science/s22.htm)
New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico
Astronomers examine brown dwarf's hazy atmosphere
by Karl Hill, December 15, 1998
Brown dwarfs, sometimes known as failed stars, have
a reputation for being the dim bulbs of the heavens. That's
one reason the first real specimen, a brown dwarf named
Gliese 229B, was discovered only three years ago. But
Gliese 229B presented a puzzle to New Mexico State
University astronomer Mark Marley and his colleagues as
they studied the strange new object, because it seemed
even darker than expected. "Brown dwarfs are supposed to
be dim, but it was turning out to be much, much darker
than we would have thought in the optical part of the
spectrum," Marley said.
Sky Survey Scientists Discover New Celestial Dwarfs
Sloan Digital SkySurvey, May 31, 1999
Scientists of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey announced
today (May 31) that early data from the Survey have
revealed a new type of astronomical object, smaller
than a star but larger than a planet.
Counting Brown Dwarfs
Earth Changes TV, August 25, 2000
Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope
have taken attendance in a class of brown dwarfs and
found indications that these odd and elusive objects also
tend to be loners. The Hubble census - the most complete
to date - provides new and compelling evidence that stars
and planets form in different ways. "Because the brown
dwarfs bridge the gap between stars and planets, their
properties reveal new and unique insights into how stars
and planets form," said Joan Najita of the National
Optical Astronomy Observatory in Tucson, AZ. The
approximate size of a brown dwarf compared to Jupiter
and the Sun. Although brown dwarfs are similar in size to
Jupiter, they are much more dense and produce their own
light whereas Jupiter shines with reflected light from the
Sun.
A Neighbor of our Solar System Discovered
Institute For Astronomy news release, November 26, 2000
The nearest stars to us provide vantage points to study the
different stellar populations in the Milky Way. They are
brighter than similar stars located at larger distances, so
they can be observed in fine detail. Considerable efforts
are devoted to finding the stars that populate our own
backyard. The most recent example is reported here. It is an
object with a mass lower than a tenth of a solar mass,
located at a distance of only 13 light years.