Planet X: SLOWING TRENDS, the Zetas Explain
To the rescue! The answer to why it took LONGER for full moons to
arrive until 1985, then began coming EARLIER (puzzle puzzle puzzle).
Why the puzzle? You are analyzing data, not only the
ACTUAL progress of the moon and earth. Look at this
from the standpoint of the Navy, and what they were
tasked with, solely. Indeed, it has taken a slight amount
of time MORE for the slowing earth to arrive lined up
for the Equinox. This is a sync point taken at
midnight and thus not easily fudged, so reflects the
actual slowdown, unannounced, to date. This is the
trend line for Equinox, taking MORE time to arrive,
and is the more obvious as it has only one factor to
consider, the Earth's orbit around the Sun.
But the full moon operates differently, as this has two
factors to consider, the moon's orbit around the Earth
as well as the turning of the Earth, and thus is more
varied and less easy for the general public to follow.
We have mentioned that to pre-set the data to make the
Earth's slowing less obvious, the Navy shortened the
full moon periods in their data charts, and this began
shortly after the CONFIRMED existence of Planet X
in 1983. This pre-setting was done so that the slowing
Earth took fewer days between full moons, in their
charts, so that the eventual actual slowdown of the
Earth would hopefully match their charts during a
time of greater curiosity and scrutiny.
But prior to this decision to pre-set the data in
anticipation of a SIGNIFICANTLY slowing Earth,
the Navy dealt with a GRADUALLY slowing Earth.
A full moon, to be visible from Earth, must line up
the Sun, Earth, and Moon so that the Moon has full
sun and is visible as such from the Earth. This puts
the Moon to the back half of the Earth, for such a view.
During the slowing rotation of the Earth, the Sun
and Moon truck along as usual, not slowing. Thus,
the Moon is positioned to present itself as FULL on
time, but the spot on Earth predicted to be able to
view a full moon may not be in position, if the Earth
is rotating more slowly. The Earth thus seems to
take LONGER, in a very gradual slowdown, for a
given spot on Earth to arrive where it can view the
full moon. The added time is only allowing the
Earth to position itself for a view.
But at a certain point in this slowing process, those
looking to view the full moon will not BE in position
on the proper night. At first, the moon is viewed
on this horizon, then overhead, then on the other
horizon, but still able to be viewed on the proper date.
The full moon is almost always sought or noticed
at night, when it is dramatic. During the day, the
degree of fullness can be confused by sunlight
disbursing through the atmosphere. Thus it was in
anticipation of a literal DAY difference between
viewing full moons, with the full moon seeming to
arrive that much early, that the chart data was pre-set.
Until the actual discovery of Planet X in 1983, there
was great reluctance, due to the possibility of
discovery, to change the predicated date/time charts.
The astronomical community is exacting, and should
the tampered data be discovered, the evidence could not
be retracted or lost. But panic reigned, during the
days when the coverup over Planet X was being hatched,
and steps were taken that give evidence of this panic.
1. the predicated full moon and equinox data were
altered to allow for a slowing earth and to put the
charts in sync with the actual placement of the
Earth and Moon - not evident unless one tracks the
trends.
2. leap seconds or fractions thereof were inserted into
the master clock, to appear to keep the Earth on a
24 hour day - not obvious unless one is a meticulous
clock-watcher.
3. an explanation of why the search for Planet X was
undertaken in the first place was proferred, as a
nebulous mathematical adjustment of various
perturbation factors - none of which makes sense to
a thinking man since the perturbations still exist, as
before.
ZetaTalk™
