Re: 10th Planet / Pioneer Probes / Dead Star Enyclopedia Diagram
In Article <Q2mO6.105$F8.1567@read1> Steve Havas wrote:
> It sounds to me like nothing has been eliminated as a
> possible cause for these probes flight anomalies ...
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2001/TECH/space/05/21/gravity.mystery/index.html
Quote from the CNN site:
An unknown force seeming to pull on a pair of distant
space probes has left astronomers with a weighty mystery,
one that appears to defy the conventional laws of physics.
The Pioneer 10 and Pioneer 11 spacecraft, which for
decades have steadily traveled in opposite directions in
the solar system, have covered significantly less space then
they should have.
CNN
And the Zetas explain:
Why do the probes slow? It is not gravity, the Sun
pulling these probes back, but particle flows that
mankind is currently unaware of. Why do the planets
in the solar system all line up into the ecliptic plane?
This phenomena occurs in the rings around Saturn
also, and in the oceans of Earth which are fatter at
the equator than at the poles. Visible matter, the
planets and rings and oceans, that mankind can SEE,
are slung faster from the waist of a rotating sun or
planet than at the poles, a matter of momentum But
it is not the SLING that keeps them at the waist, as a
sling alone would not keep them nicely in place, a
ring around the waist. There is a return of some type,
with the return coming back into the rotating sun or
planet at the poles, and then flowing in the direction
of the waist, to fill the gap caused by the sling. This
is not caused by the flow of gravity particles, as the
flow of gravity particles is even. Does an object weigh
more at the poles than at the equator? Nor is this the
flow of magnetic particles, as the rings around Saturn
and the planets in the ecliptic assume their position
regardless of magnetic properties.
The solar wind is not visible to man, yet its effect on
comet tails is quite visible. Likewise, the flow of these
particles, unknown to mankind, which force the planets
into the ecliptic plane, can be inferred from the fact
that the ecliptic exists, alone. The probes, propelled
beyond the grip of the Sun's gravitational field to where
their momentum can counteract this draw, were expected
to float along at a predictible rate, yet are doing so more
slowly. The answer lies in the wash BACK of the particle
flows that keep the planets bobbling in the ecliptic plane
and the rings of Saturn so neatly in a thin line. Just as
the fatter oceans around Earth's equator flow toward the
poles, thense wrapping around in deep ocean current back
toward the equator, this particle flow is not even in the
pressure it exerts. There is pressure from the side as well
as BACK toward the rotating sun or planet that is the
gravitational giant holding the bobbling matter in its grip.
The closer the bobbling matter is to the equator of a rotating
object, the more pressure there is from the side, pushing
the matter into the ring or ecliptic plane.
The probes were in part sent out to explore the planets in
the solar system, and were directed by their jets or a
gravitational sling around the planets being visited during
their voyage. Thus, the force of gravity from the Sun alone
was not the single force influencing the probes until they
floated to where they are today. They now, presumably,
have only their momentum and the gravity pull from the
Sun as factors in their pace. Add to this the factor of a
returning particle flow, pushing outward at the ecliptic
but immediately upon leaving the ecliptic plane flowing
BACK toward the Sun. As the particle flow leaves the
ecliptic, it is flowing toward the SIDE, away from the
ecliptic, but in the backward trip, it is buffeting from the
other side, as the currents of this flow become circular
around the ecliptic close in, as well as circular in broad
circles that extent to the poles of the Sun. This buffeting
from the side affects the rate of escape in the probes, as
they are making side trips, this way and that, however
infintesimal, and THIS likewise takes time. How would
it not? If a man walks in a forward motion only, he will
arrive faster than another who takes the time to dance to
the side, this way or that, now and then.
ZetaTalk