Re: Planet X: MAY Coordinates [OT]

In Article <AyhN6.3078$WI.545140@typhoon.hawaii.rr.com> David Tholen wrote:
> Nancy Lieder writes:
>> Neuchatal folks (who did not get offical permission to release
>> the information) got an image, but this was never received,
>
> How convenient for you.  Interesting that you haven't accused
> them of cover-up the way you've accused NASA for HST images
> that were allegedly never released.

That NASA withholds HST images, only selectively giving them out, is not
an accusation, it's a fact. Do cover-ups exists, and do folks get leaned
on?  Are lies foisted on the public?  As examples:

1.  JFK was killed by a single bullet.  He and the others
    in the car were wounded by only a single bullet,
    which traveled through several bodies making sharp
    turns and impacting bone in some cases but emerged
    intact.  This was the official explanation, in place
    today.

2.  George Bush Sr., former head of the CIA, was not in
    the loop on Iran Contra. Iran Contra would have been
    a secret operation, unknown to the public today, if
    there hadn't been an accident exposing the operation.
    Here we had an illegal operation, headquartered in
    the basement of the White House, with the President
    in the know.

What kind of tactics are used to maintain a cover-up?  I was told in the
early days of Hale-Bopp, when I asked someone with a NASA security
clearance, if NASA would lie about Hale-Bopp.  He told me that the first
newspaper story released was laced with code words that meant "do not
challenge this story".  Steve Havas, who has posted about his sighting
of Planet X at a Vancouver observatory, was told verbally by an
associated astronomer, in a hushed voice, that they know about this
inbound planet, and thus the frantic stalling tactics he encountered and
recorded.  I likewise was told in California by an astronomer who worked
at one of the major observatories that "at first we were looking for it,
then we found it, and now we're tracking it.  It comes through the solar
system every few thousand years, and pretty much tears up the earth." So
why don't they get on the bullhorn and blab?  Are they afraid of losing
a job or being put in a wacky ward with the subsequent claim they were
crazy at the time they made claims, or physically threatened?  Were it
not that Planet X CAN'T be hidden anymore, as it is visible by
observatories world-wide, so that only an "alternate explanation" can
perpetrate the cover-up at this point, I'd expect folks like Steve to be
leaned on too.  Here's a silencing method used in the past:

   The Alien Question: An Expanded Perspective
   by Neil Freer

      Tombaugh discovered Pluto in 1930. Christie, of the U.S.
      Naval Observatory, discovered Charon, Pluto's moon, in
      1978. The characteristics of Pluto derivable from the
      nature of Charon demonstrated that there must still be a
      large planet undiscovered because Pluto could not be the
      cause of the residuals, the "wobbles" in the orbital paths of
      Uranus and Neptune clearly identifiable. The IRAS
      (Infrared Astronomical Satellite), during '83 -'84, produced
      observations of a tenth planet so robust that one of the
      astronomers on the project said that "all that remains is to
      name it" - from which point the information has become
      curiously guarded. In 1992 Harrington and Van Flandern
      of the Naval Observatory, working with all the information
      they had at hand, published their findings and opinion
      that there is, indeed, a tenth planet, even calling it an
      "intruder" planet. Andersen of JPL later publicly expressed
      his belief that it could possibly be verified any time. The
      search was narrowed to the southern skies, below the
      ecliptic. Harrington invited Sitchin, having read his book
      and translations of the Enuma Elish, to a meeting at his
      office and they correlated the current findings with the
      ancient records and Harrington acknowledged the detail of
      the ancient records while indicating where the tenth planet
      may now be in the solar system.

      It is the opinion of this author that, in light of the evidence
      already obtained through the use of the Pioneer 10 and
      11 and two Voyager space craft, the Infrared Imaging
      Satellite (IRAS, `83-84) and the data available to Harrington
      when consulting with Sitchin that the search has already
      been accomplished, in fact that the planet has already
      been found. It is interesting that Harrington dispatched an
      appropriate telescope to Black Birch, New Zealand to
      get a visual confirmation, based on the data leading to
      the expectation that it would be below the ecliptic in the
      southern skies at this point in its orbit. On Harrington's
      early death the scope was immediately called back - as one
      observer noted, "almost before he was cold". ...

Robert Harrington used to be the head of the Naval Observatory, and Tom
van Flandern worked closely with Harrington at the US Naval Observatory.