Re: Hi Nancy :-))

In Article <9brt5t$144$1@news1.xs4all.nl> Jos wrote:
> In Article <3AE0C298.5209D3B5@zetatalk.com> ZetaTalk wrote:
>> Human's measure their magnetic field on the surface of the crust,
>> which is composed of hardened lava which points in the direction
>> of the magnetic field AT THE TIME the lava hardened, and thus
>> sends many signals to dilute any given compass measurement.
>
> So this crust does not have a strong field, nor does it provide a
> `handle' for an external field because it is chaotic. This mades
> me wonder what the force could be that moves the crust. ...
> This crusts-field aparently is not strong enough even at point-blank
> range to override the core's field entirely. ... Ok, so the magnetic field
> of earth is very much more powerful than measurements and
> extrapolations of these measurements taken from near/on earth
> would indicate.

From the ZetaTalk on Planetary Magnetism piece:

A planet's magnetic influence is not encapsulated by its crust,
but reaches beyond this even to the ends of the solar system.
Like the shields that men stood behind to watch an atomic blast,
they may have avoided the radiation, but the landscape behind
them was devastated. The Earth's magnetism oozes around the
various crustal plates acting as shields to recreate its essential
alignment out in space, considering any confusion the crust may
have presented as no more than an annoyance. A resonance is
involved, so that the magnetic field can reestablish itself, filling

in any blanks. Thus, when magnetized planets encounter each
other, such as when the 12th Planet passes near the Earth, the
strength of their reaction to each other is much greater than man
might imagine. Mankind's tiny magnets are but specks on the
surface of thick crusts acting as shields. Below the surface, in the

liquid core of the Earth, and in resonance high above the surface,
is where the real magnetic drama occurs.
    ZetaTalk™