Re: Planet X/12th Planet Retrograde Orbit

Article: <6gants$6uo@sjx-ixn3.ix.netcom.com> 
Subject: Re: Planet X/12th Planet Retrograde Orbit
Date: 6 Apr 1998 14:13:16 GMT

In article <6g3p26$em1@pmgm.Stanford.EDU> John Ladasky writes:
> You postulate concentrated energy beams that radiate from the 
> Sun and push the planets along -- except, of course, your 12th 
> Planet, which is mysteriously immune from this force.  If a 
> planet is in an energy beam at one moment, and out of it the 
> next, why don't we see a transient acceleration?

The statement was not that the 12th Planet was immune from the sweeping
arms of the Sun, as this is why it TAKES a retrograde orbit in the
first place, as the ZetaTalk article stated.  The Zetas wish to reply.

(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])
You do see transient acceleration.  You call them perturbations,
atmospheric distortions, ghost factors that have a null effect on the
whole, or whatever.  The orbits you observe are BALANCED, having been
in place long before you arrived to observed them.  The orbits
constitute the sum total of all influences upon a given planet - the
transient acceleration AND the slight deceleration as the sweeping arm
passes over the planet.  

Are you stating you have NO aberations in orbits you observe that you
cannot explain, fully, with your orbital mechanics?  None?
(End ZetaTalk[TM])